While former President Trump faces mounting legal battles on multiple fronts, Rep. Shri Thanedar publicly demanded Trump’s impeachment on April 18, 2025, citing the former president’s brazen disregard for a Supreme Court order. This marks what could potentially be Trump’s third impeachment – because apparently, two wasn’t enough.
The latest controversy adds to Trump’s growing list of alleged constitutional violations, including abuse of power, corrupt pardons, and election interference. Rep. Al Green has already announced plans to introduce formal articles of impeachment, focusing on Trump’s persistent defiance of judicial authority. Let that sink in: a president who thinks court orders are more like friendly suggestions. The administration’s refusal to release foreign aid funds has particularly drawn criticism from legal experts.
Trump’s previous impeachments – for extorting an ally and attempting to overturn an election – have already secured his place in history books. Before him, only two presidents had ever been impeached: Andrew Johnson in 1868 and Bill Clinton in 1998. Trump’s going for the hat trick.
Non-partisan organizations like Free Speech For People are leading the charge, documenting violations ranging from emoluments clause breaches to election security sabotage. The campaign has already gathered 1.4 million signatures nationwide in support of impeachment investigations. The allegations paint a picture of a president who treated the Constitution like an optional reading assignment.
Constitutional violations stack up like overdue library books in Trump’s presidency, with each page revealing new creative interpretations of law.
Critics point to specific incidents, including Trump’s controversial forced removal of Palestinians from Gaza and his questionable dismissal of criminal charges against public officials. His apparent vendetta against political adversaries and creative interpretation of emergency powers haven’t helped his case either.
Grassroots movements are now pressuring Congress members to support impeachment measures, arguing that Trump’s actions fundamentally threaten democratic processes. The growing momentum suggests this isn’t just another political circus – it’s about preserving constitutional standards and checks on executive power.
As pressure mounts and evidence accumulates, one thing’s becoming clear: Trump’s relationship with impeachment is starting to look less like a political process and more like a recurring subscription service.
